Students often find IIb more interesting than IIa
One recurring sentiment is that the optics-to-modern-physics material is more enjoyable or intuitive than the preceding mechanics/electricity sequence, even when the class remains challenging.
01:750:228
PHYSICS
AI-generated overview
Rutgers frames 228 as the analytical-physics continuation through optics, relativity, and quantum topics, and student discussion still treats it as a challenging course even when students like it more than 227.
The official teaching site pairs two weekly lectures with an 80-minute recitation, fifteen homework sets, textbook reading, and three major exams.
The Fall 2024 schedule moves quickly across optics, relativity, quantum mechanics, condensed matter, nuclear physics, and particle physics on a near-weekly cadence.
Rutgers grades 228 through homework, recitation work, and exams rather than papers, labs, or multi-week projects in the lecture course.
The official grading breakdown gives 66 percent of the grade to two midterms and a final exam.
As the calculus-based sequel to the analytical physics sequence, 228 still leans heavily on quantitative reasoning even while the topics become more modern and conceptual.
Student advice focuses more on problem practice and understanding derivations than on memorizing isolated formulas or facts.
Relativity, wave mechanics, atomic structure, and particle physics push the course toward highly conceptual models rather than only concrete physical setups.
This is the continuation of Rutgers' analytical physics sequence, so students are expected to arrive already comfortable with the style and math of the earlier course.
The textbook is recommended and tied to homework access, but the official structure suggests that recitation, homework, and exams drive the class more than heavy standalone reading.
Public r/rutgers threads consistently describe 750:228 as interesting but demanding. Students often say IIb feels more engaging than the earlier analytical physics term, but they still treat it as a course where conceptual practice, recitation participation, and lots of problem solving matter more than passive review.
One recurring sentiment is that the optics-to-modern-physics material is more enjoyable or intuitive than the preceding mechanics/electricity sequence, even when the class remains challenging.
Advice threads repeatedly push students toward doing many problems, checking derivations carefully, and asking questions in recitation or office hours instead of relying on lecture alone.
Students mention that success depends on understanding how formulas are derived and when models apply, not only memorizing equations or copying worked examples.
Recent discussion includes students looking for YouTube lectures and alternate explanations, which suggests many people benefit from a second pass on the material outside class.
A practical chapter-by-chapter view from foundations to applications.
Module 1
The course usually opens with geometric optics and then quickly moves into wave behavior. Official Rutgers topic lists and the Fall 2024 schedule place reflection, refraction, mirrors, lenses, interference, thin films, diffraction, and polarization at the front of the semester so students can switch between ray pictures and wave pictures of light.
Geometric optics, wave optics, relativity, and quantum mechanics each work because they model different regimes well. A big part of the course is learning when one description stops being enough.
Time, position, momentum, and energy still matter, but relativity and quantum theory change how those quantities relate and how precisely they can be interpreted.
You are not just learning formulas. You are learning how probability, quantization, and wave behavior reshape atomic-scale reasoning.
Atomic spectra, semiconductor behavior, radioactive decay, and particle classifications all depend on the underlying structure of matter and the allowed ways it can change.
Before calculating, identify which physical model the problem is using and what assumptions make that model valid.
Draw rays, wave fronts, or interference geometry first so the algebra reflects an actual physical setup.
Study how the equations are motivated and what each variable means physically, not just the final expression.
Use recitation, homework, and outside explanations early; later modules build directly on the optics, relativity, and photon foundations.
0 open · Busch
| Section | Status | Instructor | Meeting | Campus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0113536 | Closed | MASTBAUM | Tuesday 8:45 AM-9:40 AM at PHY 001; Friday 8:45 AM-9:40 AM at PHY 001; Thursday 10:20 AM-11:40 AM at SEC 204PHY 001SEC 204 | Busch |
| 0213537 | Closed | MASTBAUM | Tuesday 8:45 AM-9:40 AM at PHY 001; Friday 8:45 AM-9:40 AM at PHY 001; Thursday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at SEC 218PHY 001SEC 218 | Busch |
| 0313538 | Closed | MASTBAUM | Tuesday 8:45 AM-9:40 AM at PHY 001; Friday 8:45 AM-9:40 AM at PHY 001; Thursday 12:10 PM-1:30 PM at SEC 218PHY 001SEC 218 | Busch |
| 0413539 | Closed | MASTBAUM | Tuesday 8:45 AM-9:40 AM at PHY 001; Friday 8:45 AM-9:40 AM at PHY 001; Wednesday 7:30 PM-8:50 PM at SEC 218PHY 001SEC 218 | Busch |
Historical student surveys
Teaching
3.85
Course quality
3.71
Response rate
37.0%
Coverage
31 offerings · 2016–2025
| Instructor | Offerings | Teaching | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Montalvo, Roy | 5 | 4.20 | 3.86 |
| Wugalter Ari | 3 | 2.90 | 3.20 |
| Mastbaum, Andrew | 2 | 4.25 | 4.10 |
| Montalvo Roy | 2 | 4.20 | 3.95 |
| Zimmermann F | 2 | 3.85 | 3.70 |
| Zimmermann Frank | 2 | 3.65 | 3.60 |
Catalog and planning context
Credits
3
Current campuses
Busch
Current availability
0 open of 4
Catalog terms
Fall, Spring, Summer
Core codes
NS
Loaded terms
5
((01:750:204 or 01:750:204) and (01:640:152))<em> OR </em> ((01:750:227 or 01:750:227) and (01:640:152))<em> OR </em> ((01:750:272 or 01:750:272) and (01:640:152))
No direct degree-list membership appears in the checked-in requirement index.
01:750:228
PHYSICS
AI-generated overview
Rutgers frames 228 as the analytical-physics continuation through optics, relativity, and quantum topics, and student discussion still treats it as a challenging course even when students like it more than 227.
The official teaching site pairs two weekly lectures with an 80-minute recitation, fifteen homework sets, textbook reading, and three major exams.
The Fall 2024 schedule moves quickly across optics, relativity, quantum mechanics, condensed matter, nuclear physics, and particle physics on a near-weekly cadence.
Rutgers grades 228 through homework, recitation work, and exams rather than papers, labs, or multi-week projects in the lecture course.
The official grading breakdown gives 66 percent of the grade to two midterms and a final exam.
As the calculus-based sequel to the analytical physics sequence, 228 still leans heavily on quantitative reasoning even while the topics become more modern and conceptual.
Student advice focuses more on problem practice and understanding derivations than on memorizing isolated formulas or facts.
Relativity, wave mechanics, atomic structure, and particle physics push the course toward highly conceptual models rather than only concrete physical setups.
This is the continuation of Rutgers' analytical physics sequence, so students are expected to arrive already comfortable with the style and math of the earlier course.
The textbook is recommended and tied to homework access, but the official structure suggests that recitation, homework, and exams drive the class more than heavy standalone reading.
Public r/rutgers threads consistently describe 750:228 as interesting but demanding. Students often say IIb feels more engaging than the earlier analytical physics term, but they still treat it as a course where conceptual practice, recitation participation, and lots of problem solving matter more than passive review.
One recurring sentiment is that the optics-to-modern-physics material is more enjoyable or intuitive than the preceding mechanics/electricity sequence, even when the class remains challenging.
Advice threads repeatedly push students toward doing many problems, checking derivations carefully, and asking questions in recitation or office hours instead of relying on lecture alone.
Students mention that success depends on understanding how formulas are derived and when models apply, not only memorizing equations or copying worked examples.
Recent discussion includes students looking for YouTube lectures and alternate explanations, which suggests many people benefit from a second pass on the material outside class.
A practical chapter-by-chapter view from foundations to applications.
Module 1
The course usually opens with geometric optics and then quickly moves into wave behavior. Official Rutgers topic lists and the Fall 2024 schedule place reflection, refraction, mirrors, lenses, interference, thin films, diffraction, and polarization at the front of the semester so students can switch between ray pictures and wave pictures of light.
Geometric optics, wave optics, relativity, and quantum mechanics each work because they model different regimes well. A big part of the course is learning when one description stops being enough.
Time, position, momentum, and energy still matter, but relativity and quantum theory change how those quantities relate and how precisely they can be interpreted.
You are not just learning formulas. You are learning how probability, quantization, and wave behavior reshape atomic-scale reasoning.
Atomic spectra, semiconductor behavior, radioactive decay, and particle classifications all depend on the underlying structure of matter and the allowed ways it can change.
Before calculating, identify which physical model the problem is using and what assumptions make that model valid.
Draw rays, wave fronts, or interference geometry first so the algebra reflects an actual physical setup.
Study how the equations are motivated and what each variable means physically, not just the final expression.
Use recitation, homework, and outside explanations early; later modules build directly on the optics, relativity, and photon foundations.
0 open · Busch
| Section | Status | Instructor | Meeting | Campus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0113536 | Closed | MASTBAUM | Tuesday 8:45 AM-9:40 AM at PHY 001; Friday 8:45 AM-9:40 AM at PHY 001; Thursday 10:20 AM-11:40 AM at SEC 204PHY 001SEC 204 | Busch |
| 0213537 | Closed | MASTBAUM | Tuesday 8:45 AM-9:40 AM at PHY 001; Friday 8:45 AM-9:40 AM at PHY 001; Thursday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at SEC 218PHY 001SEC 218 | Busch |
| 0313538 | Closed | MASTBAUM | Tuesday 8:45 AM-9:40 AM at PHY 001; Friday 8:45 AM-9:40 AM at PHY 001; Thursday 12:10 PM-1:30 PM at SEC 218PHY 001SEC 218 | Busch |
| 0413539 | Closed | MASTBAUM | Tuesday 8:45 AM-9:40 AM at PHY 001; Friday 8:45 AM-9:40 AM at PHY 001; Wednesday 7:30 PM-8:50 PM at SEC 218PHY 001SEC 218 | Busch |
Historical student surveys
Teaching
3.85
Course quality
3.71
Response rate
37.0%
Coverage
31 offerings · 2016–2025
| Instructor | Offerings | Teaching | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Montalvo, Roy | 5 | 4.20 | 3.86 |
| Wugalter Ari | 3 | 2.90 | 3.20 |
| Mastbaum, Andrew | 2 | 4.25 | 4.10 |
| Montalvo Roy | 2 | 4.20 | 3.95 |
| Zimmermann F | 2 | 3.85 | 3.70 |
| Zimmermann Frank | 2 | 3.65 | 3.60 |
Catalog and planning context
Credits
3
Current campuses
Busch
Current availability
0 open of 4
Catalog terms
Fall, Spring, Summer
Core codes
NS
Loaded terms
5
((01:750:204 or 01:750:204) and (01:640:152))<em> OR </em> ((01:750:227 or 01:750:227) and (01:640:152))<em> OR </em> ((01:750:272 or 01:750:272) and (01:640:152))
No direct degree-list membership appears in the checked-in requirement index.