Preparation changes the feel of the class
Multiple Rutgers Reddit comments recommend doing post-lab or worksheet-style preparation ahead of time so the in-person portion moves faster and feels more mechanical than stressful.
01:160:171
CHEMISTRY
AI-generated overview
Student discussion usually describes 171 as manageable when you arrive prepared, though procedural mistakes can still make it frustrating.
Rutgers requires prelab work and hazard forms before each experiment, so the workload is modest but continuous rather than negligible.
The lab moves through many short experiments across one term, and students say sessions go smoothly only when prep is done ahead of time.
Success depends heavily on lab execution, writeups, and procedural organization rather than on a few isolated exams.
The official workflow is centered on experiments and prelab requirements, with no strong evidence that large common exams drive the class.
Density, empirical-formula, titration, and gas-volume calculations matter, but the quantitative work stays at a basic general-chemistry-lab level.
The course rewards following procedures and interpreting data more than memorizing large amounts of standalone content.
Most of 171 is concrete bench work and direct interpretation of visible measurements rather than highly theoretical chemistry.
It helps to bring general chemistry basics, but the course is designed to teach introductory lab habits rather than assume advanced prior lab mastery.
Students do need to read the manual and prelab material, but the evidence does not suggest a heavy text-based reading burden.
Public Rutgers discussion usually treats 171 as a relatively manageable chemistry lab when students prepare before showing up, but the same threads also warn that mistakes in procedure or unclear grading expectations can make an otherwise short lab feel frustrating.
Multiple Rutgers Reddit comments recommend doing post-lab or worksheet-style preparation ahead of time so the in-person portion moves faster and feels more mechanical than stressful.
Students commonly describe many labs as taking roughly an hour to an hour and a half, with the caveat that procedural mistakes can keep people there much longer.
Student posts focus heavily on the manual, safety quiz, goggles/lab coat logistics, and finishing forms efficiently, which suggests that organization is a large part of success.
One older thread describes arbitrary curve-based grading, while another commenter familiar with the course said the grading approach had changed. It is safest to treat grading stories as section- and era-specific rather than universal.
A practical chapter-by-chapter view from foundations to applications.
Module 1
The opening labs establish how the course wants you to work: careful measurement, correct significant figures, and turning raw observations into a physical property such as density. This is less about abstract chemistry theory than about learning the habits that make later quantitative experiments trustworthy.
In 171, a correct idea can still produce bad results if glassware is read poorly, masses are recorded sloppily, or the written procedure is ignored.
Density, hydration, ionic reactions, and titration all ask students to connect what they can measure directly to something molecular they cannot see.
Rather than staying inside homework problems, mole ratios and formulas show up as tools for explaining actual experimental outcomes.
The important move is not just filling blanks, but showing how measurements, calculations, and observed changes support the conclusion you write down.
Read the experiment before lab, especially the safety rules, data tables, and calculation setup, so the bench work does not become guesswork.
Slow down on balances, meniscus readings, sig figs, and unit tracking because these routine details often determine whether the final answer looks chemically reasonable.
Know what quantity each step is trying to determine while you are collecting data, not only when you start writing the report.
If a value seems off or a step behaves unexpectedly, ask the TA immediately; small procedural errors can ripple through the whole write-up.
2 open · Livingston
| Section | Status | Instructor | Meeting | Campus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0110954 | Closed | Vitarelli | Monday 10:20 AM-1:20 PM at BE 050BE 050 | Livingston |
| 0210955 | Closed | Vitarelli | Monday 10:20 AM-1:20 PM at BE 051BE 051 | Livingston |
| 0310956 | Closed | Vitarelli | Monday 10:20 AM-1:20 PM at BE 052BE 052 | Livingston |
| 0410957 | Closed | Vitarelli | Monday 10:20 AM-1:20 PM at BE 053BE 053 | Livingston |
| 0510958 | Closed | Vitarelli | Monday 10:20 AM-1:20 PM at BE 152BE 152 | Livingston |
| 0629789 | Closed | Vitarelli | Monday 10:20 AM-1:20 PM at BE 153BE 153 | Livingston |
| 0710959 | Closed | Vitarelli | Monday 2:00 PM-5:00 PM at BE 050BE 050 | Livingston |
| 0810960 | Closed | Vitarelli | Monday 2:00 PM-5:00 PM at BE 051BE 051 | Livingston |
| 0910961 | Closed | Vitarelli | Monday 2:00 PM-5:00 PM at BE 052BE 052 | Livingston |
| 1010962 | Closed | Vitarelli | Monday 2:00 PM-5:00 PM at BE 053BE 053 | Livingston |
| 1110963 | Closed | Vitarelli | Monday 2:00 PM-5:00 PM at BE 152BE 152 | Livingston |
| 1229787 | Closed | Vitarelli | Monday 2:00 PM-5:00 PM at BE 153BE 153 | Livingston |
| 1310964 | Closed | Vitarelli | Tuesday 10:20 AM-1:20 PM at BE 050BE 050 | Livingston |
| 1410965 | Closed | Vitarelli | Tuesday 10:20 AM-1:20 PM at BE 051BE 051 | Livingston |
| 1510966 | Closed | Vitarelli | Tuesday 10:20 AM-1:20 PM at BE 052BE 052 | Livingston |
| 1610967 | Closed | Vitarelli | Tuesday 10:20 AM-1:20 PM at BE 053BE 053 | Livingston |
Historical student surveys
Teaching
4.24
Course quality
4.12
Response rate
42.5%
Coverage
820 offerings · 2014–2025
| Instructor | Offerings | Teaching | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitarelli | 473 | 4.15 | 4.13 |
| Slomko, Danielle | 38 | 4.18 | 4.11 |
| Bean, Brynn | 30 | 4.70 | 4.33 |
| Williams | 28 | 4.05 | 3.91 |
| Urakath, Rijo | 27 | 4.58 | 4.27 |
| Chen, Tracy | 26 | 4.34 | 4.03 |
Catalog and planning context
Credits
1
Current campuses
Livingston
Current availability
2 open of 56
Catalog terms
Fall, Spring, Summer, Winter
Core codes
None listed
Loaded terms
3
(01:160:159)<em> OR </em>(01:160:161)<em> OR </em>(01:160:163)<em> OR </em>(01:160:165)<em> OR </em>(21:160:115)<em> OR </em>(50:160:115)
No direct degree-list membership appears in the checked-in requirement index.
01:160:171
CHEMISTRY
AI-generated overview
Student discussion usually describes 171 as manageable when you arrive prepared, though procedural mistakes can still make it frustrating.
Rutgers requires prelab work and hazard forms before each experiment, so the workload is modest but continuous rather than negligible.
The lab moves through many short experiments across one term, and students say sessions go smoothly only when prep is done ahead of time.
Success depends heavily on lab execution, writeups, and procedural organization rather than on a few isolated exams.
The official workflow is centered on experiments and prelab requirements, with no strong evidence that large common exams drive the class.
Density, empirical-formula, titration, and gas-volume calculations matter, but the quantitative work stays at a basic general-chemistry-lab level.
The course rewards following procedures and interpreting data more than memorizing large amounts of standalone content.
Most of 171 is concrete bench work and direct interpretation of visible measurements rather than highly theoretical chemistry.
It helps to bring general chemistry basics, but the course is designed to teach introductory lab habits rather than assume advanced prior lab mastery.
Students do need to read the manual and prelab material, but the evidence does not suggest a heavy text-based reading burden.
Public Rutgers discussion usually treats 171 as a relatively manageable chemistry lab when students prepare before showing up, but the same threads also warn that mistakes in procedure or unclear grading expectations can make an otherwise short lab feel frustrating.
Multiple Rutgers Reddit comments recommend doing post-lab or worksheet-style preparation ahead of time so the in-person portion moves faster and feels more mechanical than stressful.
Students commonly describe many labs as taking roughly an hour to an hour and a half, with the caveat that procedural mistakes can keep people there much longer.
Student posts focus heavily on the manual, safety quiz, goggles/lab coat logistics, and finishing forms efficiently, which suggests that organization is a large part of success.
One older thread describes arbitrary curve-based grading, while another commenter familiar with the course said the grading approach had changed. It is safest to treat grading stories as section- and era-specific rather than universal.
A practical chapter-by-chapter view from foundations to applications.
Module 1
The opening labs establish how the course wants you to work: careful measurement, correct significant figures, and turning raw observations into a physical property such as density. This is less about abstract chemistry theory than about learning the habits that make later quantitative experiments trustworthy.
In 171, a correct idea can still produce bad results if glassware is read poorly, masses are recorded sloppily, or the written procedure is ignored.
Density, hydration, ionic reactions, and titration all ask students to connect what they can measure directly to something molecular they cannot see.
Rather than staying inside homework problems, mole ratios and formulas show up as tools for explaining actual experimental outcomes.
The important move is not just filling blanks, but showing how measurements, calculations, and observed changes support the conclusion you write down.
Read the experiment before lab, especially the safety rules, data tables, and calculation setup, so the bench work does not become guesswork.
Slow down on balances, meniscus readings, sig figs, and unit tracking because these routine details often determine whether the final answer looks chemically reasonable.
Know what quantity each step is trying to determine while you are collecting data, not only when you start writing the report.
If a value seems off or a step behaves unexpectedly, ask the TA immediately; small procedural errors can ripple through the whole write-up.
2 open · Livingston
| Section | Status | Instructor | Meeting | Campus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0110954 | Closed | Vitarelli | Monday 10:20 AM-1:20 PM at BE 050BE 050 | Livingston |
| 0210955 | Closed | Vitarelli | Monday 10:20 AM-1:20 PM at BE 051BE 051 | Livingston |
| 0310956 | Closed | Vitarelli | Monday 10:20 AM-1:20 PM at BE 052BE 052 | Livingston |
| 0410957 | Closed | Vitarelli | Monday 10:20 AM-1:20 PM at BE 053BE 053 | Livingston |
| 0510958 | Closed | Vitarelli | Monday 10:20 AM-1:20 PM at BE 152BE 152 | Livingston |
| 0629789 | Closed | Vitarelli | Monday 10:20 AM-1:20 PM at BE 153BE 153 | Livingston |
| 0710959 | Closed | Vitarelli | Monday 2:00 PM-5:00 PM at BE 050BE 050 | Livingston |
| 0810960 | Closed | Vitarelli | Monday 2:00 PM-5:00 PM at BE 051BE 051 | Livingston |
| 0910961 | Closed | Vitarelli | Monday 2:00 PM-5:00 PM at BE 052BE 052 | Livingston |
| 1010962 | Closed | Vitarelli | Monday 2:00 PM-5:00 PM at BE 053BE 053 | Livingston |
| 1110963 | Closed | Vitarelli | Monday 2:00 PM-5:00 PM at BE 152BE 152 | Livingston |
| 1229787 | Closed | Vitarelli | Monday 2:00 PM-5:00 PM at BE 153BE 153 | Livingston |
| 1310964 | Closed | Vitarelli | Tuesday 10:20 AM-1:20 PM at BE 050BE 050 | Livingston |
| 1410965 | Closed | Vitarelli | Tuesday 10:20 AM-1:20 PM at BE 051BE 051 | Livingston |
| 1510966 | Closed | Vitarelli | Tuesday 10:20 AM-1:20 PM at BE 052BE 052 | Livingston |
| 1610967 | Closed | Vitarelli | Tuesday 10:20 AM-1:20 PM at BE 053BE 053 | Livingston |
Historical student surveys
Teaching
4.24
Course quality
4.12
Response rate
42.5%
Coverage
820 offerings · 2014–2025
| Instructor | Offerings | Teaching | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitarelli | 473 | 4.15 | 4.13 |
| Slomko, Danielle | 38 | 4.18 | 4.11 |
| Bean, Brynn | 30 | 4.70 | 4.33 |
| Williams | 28 | 4.05 | 3.91 |
| Urakath, Rijo | 27 | 4.58 | 4.27 |
| Chen, Tracy | 26 | 4.34 | 4.03 |
Catalog and planning context
Credits
1
Current campuses
Livingston
Current availability
2 open of 56
Catalog terms
Fall, Spring, Summer, Winter
Core codes
None listed
Loaded terms
3
(01:160:159)<em> OR </em>(01:160:161)<em> OR </em>(01:160:163)<em> OR </em>(01:160:165)<em> OR </em>(21:160:115)<em> OR </em>(50:160:115)
No direct degree-list membership appears in the checked-in requirement index.