Topic choice is a major quality-of-life factor
Students repeatedly talk about 355:201 by section theme or instructor, which matches the official Rutgers model where the course content changes substantially by topic.
01:355:201
ENGLISH - COMPOSITION AND WRITING
AI-generated overview
Official Rutgers materials frame 355:201 as an upper-level research writing course, but student discussion suggests it is usually manageable when the section topic and professor fit well.
The course requires topic selection, source gathering, research notes, annotated bibliography work, multiple drafts, a final paper, and a presentation.
The grading formula breaks the semester into research preparation, proposal work, several draft stages, and the final paper and presentation.
Nearly the whole course is a scaffolded research project, from proposal and journal work through successive drafts and the final presentation.
Rutgers publishes a project-based grading formula with papers, research work, and presentation rather than tests.
The shared course design emphasizes source evaluation, argument, and writing process, while quantitative demands depend on the section topic rather than the course core.
Students have to track sources and course themes, but the course rewards synthesis, citation practice, and revision more than memorizing facts for exams.
Students must frame a research question, join an ongoing conversation, and evaluate source credibility, but most sections still anchor those skills in a concrete topic area.
This is a second writing requirement course, so basic college-level reading and writing habits matter, but the official description does not assume narrow disciplinary prerequisites.
Students read section materials while also working through books, journal articles, and other sources for their own project.
Public r/rutgers discussion treats 355:201 as a useful second writing course whose experience depends heavily on section topic and instructor. The common thread is that students see it as more research-driven than first-year composition, with the best experiences coming when the topic genuinely interests them.
Students repeatedly talk about 355:201 by section theme or instructor, which matches the official Rutgers model where the course content changes substantially by topic.
Some students explicitly say the class improved their ability to break down sources, organize evidence, and structure arguments because the research process is scaffolded in steps.
Advice threads often warn that workload and grading can feel very different across instructors, so the same course number can feel lighter or much more demanding depending on section.
Even positive comments frame 355:201 as a class with real drafting and research responsibilities, especially once the final paper and presentation come into view.
A practical chapter-by-chapter view from foundations to applications.
Module 1
Rutgers's official 355:201 page shows that each section is organized around a theme such as digital identity, sports and culture, documentary film, stress and mental health, or architecture and public space. The shared first step is learning the section's vocabulary and disciplinary lens well enough to ask a serious question inside it.
Research is not something you finish before writing begins. In 355:201, question formation, source evaluation, drafting, and revision all shape each other.
Whether the section is about film, stress, sports, digital identity, or ethnography, the shared goal is learning how to build a disciplined research argument.
Rutgers explicitly highlights the difference between scholarly, credible, and non-credible sources, so source choice is one of the course's central intellectual tasks.
The draft sequence matters because long papers usually improve when students rethink structure, synthesis, and evidence use rather than only edit sentences.
Narrow to a specific question, case, debate, or text set that you can actually investigate with available sources.
As you read, track what each source contributes, how credible it is, and how it changes your argument.
Use the staged drafts to test your claim, paragraph logic, and source integration early enough to make structural changes.
Because the research project grows out of the section theme, topic fit and instructor style matter more here than in many broad core classes.
2 open · Livingston, C/D, College Avenue
| Section | Status | Instructor | Meeting | Campus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0330174 | Closed | LILLEY, DAWN | Tuesday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at TIL 123; Thursday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at TIL 123TIL 123 | Livingston |
| 0530173 | Closed | SCHWARTZ | Tuesday 12:10 PM-1:30 PM at LSH B111; Friday 12:10 PM-1:30 PM at LSH B111LSH B111 | Livingston |
| A312030 | Closed | PERRYMAN, SARA | Tuesday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at HCK 127; Thursday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at HCK 127HCK 127 | C/D |
| A412031 | Closed | LALLAS, DEMETRI | Monday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at HCK 213; Wednesday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at HCK 213HCK 213 | C/D |
| A612033 | Closed | LALLAS, DEMETRI | Monday 12:10 PM-1:30 PM at HCK 209; Thursday 12:10 PM-1:30 PM at HCK 209HCK 209 | C/D |
| A712034 | Closed | MOLIN, PETER | Tuesday 12:10 PM-1:30 PM at TIL 103D; Friday 12:10 PM-1:30 PM at TIL 103DTIL 103D | Livingston |
| B112035 | Closed | MUSAT, RALUCA | Tuesday 3:50 PM-5:10 PM at TIL 103D; Thursday 3:50 PM-5:10 PM at TIL 103DTIL 103D | Livingston |
| D312038 | Open | RASHED, DOAA | Monday 10:20 AM-11:40 AM at CI 203; Thursday 10:20 AM-11:40 AM at CI 203CI 203 | College Avenue |
| D412039 | Closed | ROBINSON | Tuesday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at FH A4; Thursday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at FH A4FH A4 | College Avenue |
| F112040 | Closed | WARREN, JOHN | Monday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at HCK 114; Wednesday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at HCK 114HCK 114 | C/D |
| F212041 | Closed | HEDGES, TIMOTHY | Monday 12:10 PM-1:30 PM at HCK 115; Thursday 12:10 PM-1:30 PM at HCK 115HCK 115 | C/D |
| H112036 | Open | WICKHAMSMITH | Tuesday 3:50 PM-5:10 PM at FH A1; Thursday 3:50 PM-5:10 PM at FH A1FH A1 | College Avenue |
Historical student surveys
Teaching
4.55
Course quality
4.31
Response rate
69.2%
Coverage
877 offerings · 2014–2025
| Instructor | Offerings | Teaching | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lilley, Dawn | 24 | 4.90 | 4.72 |
| Thompson, Karen | 22 | 4.35 | 4.14 |
| Schroepfer, George | 20 | 4.48 | 4.41 |
| LILLEY DAWN | 20 | 4.81 | 4.39 |
| Musat, Raluca | 19 | 4.72 | 4.53 |
| Jovanoski, Jordanco | 17 | 4.79 | 4.59 |
Catalog and planning context
Credits
3
Current campuses
Livingston, C/D, College Avenue
Current availability
2 open of 12
Catalog terms
Fall, Spring, Summer
Core codes
SOEHS, WCd, WCr
Loaded terms
5
(01:355:101)<em> OR </em>(01:355:103)<em> OR </em>(01:355:104)<em> OR </em>(21:355:102)<em> OR </em>(50:989:102)
No direct degree-list membership appears in the checked-in requirement index.
01:355:201
ENGLISH - COMPOSITION AND WRITING
AI-generated overview
Official Rutgers materials frame 355:201 as an upper-level research writing course, but student discussion suggests it is usually manageable when the section topic and professor fit well.
The course requires topic selection, source gathering, research notes, annotated bibliography work, multiple drafts, a final paper, and a presentation.
The grading formula breaks the semester into research preparation, proposal work, several draft stages, and the final paper and presentation.
Nearly the whole course is a scaffolded research project, from proposal and journal work through successive drafts and the final presentation.
Rutgers publishes a project-based grading formula with papers, research work, and presentation rather than tests.
The shared course design emphasizes source evaluation, argument, and writing process, while quantitative demands depend on the section topic rather than the course core.
Students have to track sources and course themes, but the course rewards synthesis, citation practice, and revision more than memorizing facts for exams.
Students must frame a research question, join an ongoing conversation, and evaluate source credibility, but most sections still anchor those skills in a concrete topic area.
This is a second writing requirement course, so basic college-level reading and writing habits matter, but the official description does not assume narrow disciplinary prerequisites.
Students read section materials while also working through books, journal articles, and other sources for their own project.
Public r/rutgers discussion treats 355:201 as a useful second writing course whose experience depends heavily on section topic and instructor. The common thread is that students see it as more research-driven than first-year composition, with the best experiences coming when the topic genuinely interests them.
Students repeatedly talk about 355:201 by section theme or instructor, which matches the official Rutgers model where the course content changes substantially by topic.
Some students explicitly say the class improved their ability to break down sources, organize evidence, and structure arguments because the research process is scaffolded in steps.
Advice threads often warn that workload and grading can feel very different across instructors, so the same course number can feel lighter or much more demanding depending on section.
Even positive comments frame 355:201 as a class with real drafting and research responsibilities, especially once the final paper and presentation come into view.
A practical chapter-by-chapter view from foundations to applications.
Module 1
Rutgers's official 355:201 page shows that each section is organized around a theme such as digital identity, sports and culture, documentary film, stress and mental health, or architecture and public space. The shared first step is learning the section's vocabulary and disciplinary lens well enough to ask a serious question inside it.
Research is not something you finish before writing begins. In 355:201, question formation, source evaluation, drafting, and revision all shape each other.
Whether the section is about film, stress, sports, digital identity, or ethnography, the shared goal is learning how to build a disciplined research argument.
Rutgers explicitly highlights the difference between scholarly, credible, and non-credible sources, so source choice is one of the course's central intellectual tasks.
The draft sequence matters because long papers usually improve when students rethink structure, synthesis, and evidence use rather than only edit sentences.
Narrow to a specific question, case, debate, or text set that you can actually investigate with available sources.
As you read, track what each source contributes, how credible it is, and how it changes your argument.
Use the staged drafts to test your claim, paragraph logic, and source integration early enough to make structural changes.
Because the research project grows out of the section theme, topic fit and instructor style matter more here than in many broad core classes.
2 open · Livingston, C/D, College Avenue
| Section | Status | Instructor | Meeting | Campus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0330174 | Closed | LILLEY, DAWN | Tuesday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at TIL 123; Thursday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at TIL 123TIL 123 | Livingston |
| 0530173 | Closed | SCHWARTZ | Tuesday 12:10 PM-1:30 PM at LSH B111; Friday 12:10 PM-1:30 PM at LSH B111LSH B111 | Livingston |
| A312030 | Closed | PERRYMAN, SARA | Tuesday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at HCK 127; Thursday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at HCK 127HCK 127 | C/D |
| A412031 | Closed | LALLAS, DEMETRI | Monday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at HCK 213; Wednesday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at HCK 213HCK 213 | C/D |
| A612033 | Closed | LALLAS, DEMETRI | Monday 12:10 PM-1:30 PM at HCK 209; Thursday 12:10 PM-1:30 PM at HCK 209HCK 209 | C/D |
| A712034 | Closed | MOLIN, PETER | Tuesday 12:10 PM-1:30 PM at TIL 103D; Friday 12:10 PM-1:30 PM at TIL 103DTIL 103D | Livingston |
| B112035 | Closed | MUSAT, RALUCA | Tuesday 3:50 PM-5:10 PM at TIL 103D; Thursday 3:50 PM-5:10 PM at TIL 103DTIL 103D | Livingston |
| D312038 | Open | RASHED, DOAA | Monday 10:20 AM-11:40 AM at CI 203; Thursday 10:20 AM-11:40 AM at CI 203CI 203 | College Avenue |
| D412039 | Closed | ROBINSON | Tuesday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at FH A4; Thursday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at FH A4FH A4 | College Avenue |
| F112040 | Closed | WARREN, JOHN | Monday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at HCK 114; Wednesday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at HCK 114HCK 114 | C/D |
| F212041 | Closed | HEDGES, TIMOTHY | Monday 12:10 PM-1:30 PM at HCK 115; Thursday 12:10 PM-1:30 PM at HCK 115HCK 115 | C/D |
| H112036 | Open | WICKHAMSMITH | Tuesday 3:50 PM-5:10 PM at FH A1; Thursday 3:50 PM-5:10 PM at FH A1FH A1 | College Avenue |
Historical student surveys
Teaching
4.55
Course quality
4.31
Response rate
69.2%
Coverage
877 offerings · 2014–2025
| Instructor | Offerings | Teaching | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lilley, Dawn | 24 | 4.90 | 4.72 |
| Thompson, Karen | 22 | 4.35 | 4.14 |
| Schroepfer, George | 20 | 4.48 | 4.41 |
| LILLEY DAWN | 20 | 4.81 | 4.39 |
| Musat, Raluca | 19 | 4.72 | 4.53 |
| Jovanoski, Jordanco | 17 | 4.79 | 4.59 |
Catalog and planning context
Credits
3
Current campuses
Livingston, C/D, College Avenue
Current availability
2 open of 12
Catalog terms
Fall, Spring, Summer
Core codes
SOEHS, WCd, WCr
Loaded terms
5
(01:355:101)<em> OR </em>(01:355:103)<em> OR </em>(01:355:104)<em> OR </em>(21:355:102)<em> OR </em>(50:989:102)
No direct degree-list membership appears in the checked-in requirement index.