Helpful acclimation for transfers
Students describe the class as a useful bridge into Rutgers standards, especially if they want explicit practice with what counts as strong analytical writing on campus.
01:355:301
ENGLISH - COMPOSITION AND WRITING
AI-generated overview
Rutgers requires transfer students to produce two analytical essays and an 8-10 page research paper, and student discussion warns that the class can feel high-stakes when those major papers pile up.
The official course structure centers two four-page essays plus a substantial research paper, which points to regular drafting, revision, and source work across the term.
The assignment sequence is substantial but concentrated into a small number of major papers, so the pace looks moderate until a student falls behind on drafts or research milestones.
Course success depends almost entirely on sustained writing projects, especially the final 8-10 page research paper and the revision-heavy essay sequence before it.
Rutgers describes the class through essays and a research paper rather than through quizzes or high-stakes tests.
The course is an academic writing and research class with no official indication of quantitative or formal-math content.
Students are evaluated on close reading, argument, revision, and source use, not on memorizing a large fixed body of facts.
The course asks students to frame motives, stakes, and scholarly conversations, which is more conceptually demanding than a purely practical writing workshop.
Rutgers restricts the course to transfer students who already have WC credit, and students who arrive shaky on Rutgers-style analytical writing are likely to feel that gap quickly.
Close reading and research are built into the official assignment sequence, so students should expect meaningful reading and source-evaluation work alongside the writing.
Rutgers Reddit discussion suggests many transfer students find 355:301 genuinely helpful for learning Rutgers writing expectations and finishing a WCd or WCr requirement, but they also describe it as professor-dependent and high-stakes because a few major papers carry much of the course.
Students describe the class as a useful bridge into Rutgers standards, especially if they want explicit practice with what counts as strong analytical writing on campus.
Multiple comments frame the experience as highly professor-dependent, which makes section theme and teaching style more important than the course title alone.
Students mention a small number of major assignments, including short essays and a larger final paper or presentation sequence, so falling behind on drafts can make the class feel much harder.
A practical chapter-by-chapter view from foundations to applications.
Module 1
The course starts by translating transfer writing experience into the specific reading, analytical, and revision habits Rutgers writing faculty expect. Because section themes vary by semester, the stable through-line is learning how Rutgers wants arguments to be framed and supported.
The course pushes students away from broad summary and toward making a claim that interprets why a source, issue, or debate matters.
Because the class satisfies WCr as well as WCd, revision is not an afterthought. Feedback is supposed to change the structure and precision of the argument.
The final paper works best when the topic is small enough to investigate closely and large enough to connect to a real academic conversation.
Scholarly articles do not speak for themselves. Students are expected to explain why a source matters and how it interacts with the paper's own claim.
Shrink the question until the paper can take a real position on a specific debate, case, or pattern.
After every paraphrase or quotation, explain what the evidence proves and why the reader should care.
Treat proposals, conferences, and draft checkpoints as part of the grade-bearing writing process, not optional prep.
Revise thesis wording, paragraph order, and source framing before line-level edits.
2 open · Livingston, College Avenue
| Section | Status | Instructor | Meeting | Campus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0212047 | Closed | BLOMQUIST, SARA | Monday 10:20 AM-11:40 AM at BE 003; Thursday 10:20 AM-11:40 AM at BE 003BE 003 | Livingston |
| 0412049 | Closed | MORRONE, PETER | Tuesday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at FH B1; Thursday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at FH B1FH B1 | College Avenue |
| 0612051 | Open | SCHWARTZ | Tuesday 10:20 AM-11:40 AM at LSH B111; Friday 10:20 AM-11:40 AM at LSH B111LSH B111 | Livingston |
| 0712052 | Open | LILLEY, DAWN | Tuesday 8:30 AM-9:50 AM at LSH B109; Friday 8:30 AM-9:50 AM at LSH B109LSH B109 | Livingston |
Historical student surveys
Teaching
4.44
Course quality
4.24
Response rate
69.1%
Coverage
92 offerings · 2016–2025
| Instructor | Offerings | Teaching | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Morrone, Peter | 13 | 4.32 | 4.12 |
| Musat, Raluca | 10 | 4.46 | 4.30 |
| FLYNN JULIE | 9 | 4.43 | 4.23 |
| MORRONE PETER | 9 | 4.44 | 4.16 |
| Molin, Peter | 8 | 4.56 | 4.41 |
| Blomquist, Sara | 7 | 4.40 | 4.33 |
Catalog and planning context
Credits
3
Current campuses
Livingston, College Avenue
Current availability
2 open of 4
Catalog terms
Fall, Spring
Core codes
SOEHS, WCd, WCr
Loaded terms
4
(01:355:101)<em> OR </em>(01:355:103)<em> OR </em>(01:355:104)<em> OR </em>(21:355:102)<em> OR </em>(50:989:102)
No direct degree-list membership appears in the checked-in requirement index.
01:355:301
ENGLISH - COMPOSITION AND WRITING
AI-generated overview
Rutgers requires transfer students to produce two analytical essays and an 8-10 page research paper, and student discussion warns that the class can feel high-stakes when those major papers pile up.
The official course structure centers two four-page essays plus a substantial research paper, which points to regular drafting, revision, and source work across the term.
The assignment sequence is substantial but concentrated into a small number of major papers, so the pace looks moderate until a student falls behind on drafts or research milestones.
Course success depends almost entirely on sustained writing projects, especially the final 8-10 page research paper and the revision-heavy essay sequence before it.
Rutgers describes the class through essays and a research paper rather than through quizzes or high-stakes tests.
The course is an academic writing and research class with no official indication of quantitative or formal-math content.
Students are evaluated on close reading, argument, revision, and source use, not on memorizing a large fixed body of facts.
The course asks students to frame motives, stakes, and scholarly conversations, which is more conceptually demanding than a purely practical writing workshop.
Rutgers restricts the course to transfer students who already have WC credit, and students who arrive shaky on Rutgers-style analytical writing are likely to feel that gap quickly.
Close reading and research are built into the official assignment sequence, so students should expect meaningful reading and source-evaluation work alongside the writing.
Rutgers Reddit discussion suggests many transfer students find 355:301 genuinely helpful for learning Rutgers writing expectations and finishing a WCd or WCr requirement, but they also describe it as professor-dependent and high-stakes because a few major papers carry much of the course.
Students describe the class as a useful bridge into Rutgers standards, especially if they want explicit practice with what counts as strong analytical writing on campus.
Multiple comments frame the experience as highly professor-dependent, which makes section theme and teaching style more important than the course title alone.
Students mention a small number of major assignments, including short essays and a larger final paper or presentation sequence, so falling behind on drafts can make the class feel much harder.
A practical chapter-by-chapter view from foundations to applications.
Module 1
The course starts by translating transfer writing experience into the specific reading, analytical, and revision habits Rutgers writing faculty expect. Because section themes vary by semester, the stable through-line is learning how Rutgers wants arguments to be framed and supported.
The course pushes students away from broad summary and toward making a claim that interprets why a source, issue, or debate matters.
Because the class satisfies WCr as well as WCd, revision is not an afterthought. Feedback is supposed to change the structure and precision of the argument.
The final paper works best when the topic is small enough to investigate closely and large enough to connect to a real academic conversation.
Scholarly articles do not speak for themselves. Students are expected to explain why a source matters and how it interacts with the paper's own claim.
Shrink the question until the paper can take a real position on a specific debate, case, or pattern.
After every paraphrase or quotation, explain what the evidence proves and why the reader should care.
Treat proposals, conferences, and draft checkpoints as part of the grade-bearing writing process, not optional prep.
Revise thesis wording, paragraph order, and source framing before line-level edits.
2 open · Livingston, College Avenue
| Section | Status | Instructor | Meeting | Campus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0212047 | Closed | BLOMQUIST, SARA | Monday 10:20 AM-11:40 AM at BE 003; Thursday 10:20 AM-11:40 AM at BE 003BE 003 | Livingston |
| 0412049 | Closed | MORRONE, PETER | Tuesday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at FH B1; Thursday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at FH B1FH B1 | College Avenue |
| 0612051 | Open | SCHWARTZ | Tuesday 10:20 AM-11:40 AM at LSH B111; Friday 10:20 AM-11:40 AM at LSH B111LSH B111 | Livingston |
| 0712052 | Open | LILLEY, DAWN | Tuesday 8:30 AM-9:50 AM at LSH B109; Friday 8:30 AM-9:50 AM at LSH B109LSH B109 | Livingston |
Historical student surveys
Teaching
4.44
Course quality
4.24
Response rate
69.1%
Coverage
92 offerings · 2016–2025
| Instructor | Offerings | Teaching | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Morrone, Peter | 13 | 4.32 | 4.12 |
| Musat, Raluca | 10 | 4.46 | 4.30 |
| FLYNN JULIE | 9 | 4.43 | 4.23 |
| MORRONE PETER | 9 | 4.44 | 4.16 |
| Molin, Peter | 8 | 4.56 | 4.41 |
| Blomquist, Sara | 7 | 4.40 | 4.33 |
Catalog and planning context
Credits
3
Current campuses
Livingston, College Avenue
Current availability
2 open of 4
Catalog terms
Fall, Spring
Core codes
SOEHS, WCd, WCr
Loaded terms
4
(01:355:101)<em> OR </em>(01:355:103)<em> OR </em>(01:355:104)<em> OR </em>(21:355:102)<em> OR </em>(50:989:102)
No direct degree-list membership appears in the checked-in requirement index.