Project-based workload
Students describe practical documents and group work as central to the experience.
01:355:202
ENGLISH - COMPOSITION AND WRITING
AI-generated overview
Rutgers frames the course around practical workplace documents, and the available student discussion describes the major assignment sequence as manageable when paced out.
Official course details require multiple document genres, significant independent research, and a multi-week collaborative project, which points to a steady but not extreme workload.
Students move across several workplace genres while building toward a group project, so the term appears consistently active without looking compressed like a problem-set-heavy STEM course.
Rutgers explicitly says lessons build to a multi-week group collaborative project and that students practice multiple workplace documents along the way.
The official description emphasizes documents, research, and collaboration rather than tests, so performance appears to depend far more on writing work than on exams.
The published course focus is workplace communication, audience analysis, research reports, and instructions rather than quantitative reasoning.
The course looks driven by drafting, revision, and genre adaptation, not by recall of a large body of fixed facts.
Audience and purpose matter conceptually, but the work stays close to concrete workplace writing tasks and usable documents.
Students need baseline college writing competence, but Rutgers presents this as a fundamentals course rather than one that assumes deep prior technical training.
Rutgers says a significant amount of independent research is required, suggesting a moderate reading and source-gathering burden even if assigned reading is not the main event.
Public student discussion often describes the class by project types and compares it with other writing options; exact assignments vary by section.
Students describe practical documents and group work as central to the experience.
The workplace-document focus makes the course feel different from literary or research-only writing courses.
A practical chapter-by-chapter view from foundations to applications.
Module 1
Technical communication starts with understanding what readers need and why the document exists.
Technical writing succeeds when readers can act on it.
A memo, instruction set, and report organize information differently.
Collaborative writing works best with roles, shared standards, and revision plans.
Define the workplace reader and what they need to do.
Use headings, sequence, and formatting to make documents usable.
Plan voice, structure, and revision together.
2 open · C/D
| Section | Status | Instructor | Meeting | Campus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0112042 | Open | MAGRINO | Monday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at HCK 123; Wednesday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at HCK 123HCK 123 | C/D |
| 0212043 | Open | MAGRINO | Monday 12:10 PM-1:30 PM at HCK 123; Thursday 12:10 PM-1:30 PM at HCK 123HCK 123 | C/D |
Historical student surveys
Teaching
4.45
Course quality
4.34
Response rate
79.8%
Coverage
44 offerings · 2016–2025
| Instructor | Offerings | Teaching | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Howland, David | 10 | 4.65 | 4.54 |
| Howland, Dave | 8 | 4.51 | 4.41 |
| WHEELER PATRICK | 7 | 4.33 | 4.27 |
| DELAURENTIS CATHERINE | 6 | 3.97 | 3.88 |
| HOWLAND DAVID | 4 | 4.60 | 4.33 |
| Magrino, William | 3 | 4.57 | 4.57 |
Catalog and planning context
Credits
3
Current campuses
C/D
Current availability
2 open of 2
Catalog terms
Fall, Spring
Core codes
WCr
Loaded terms
4
(01:355:101)<em> OR </em>(01:355:103)<em> OR </em>(01:355:104)<em> OR </em>(21:355:102)<em> OR </em>(50:989:102)
No direct degree-list membership appears in the checked-in requirement index.
01:355:202
ENGLISH - COMPOSITION AND WRITING
AI-generated overview
Rutgers frames the course around practical workplace documents, and the available student discussion describes the major assignment sequence as manageable when paced out.
Official course details require multiple document genres, significant independent research, and a multi-week collaborative project, which points to a steady but not extreme workload.
Students move across several workplace genres while building toward a group project, so the term appears consistently active without looking compressed like a problem-set-heavy STEM course.
Rutgers explicitly says lessons build to a multi-week group collaborative project and that students practice multiple workplace documents along the way.
The official description emphasizes documents, research, and collaboration rather than tests, so performance appears to depend far more on writing work than on exams.
The published course focus is workplace communication, audience analysis, research reports, and instructions rather than quantitative reasoning.
The course looks driven by drafting, revision, and genre adaptation, not by recall of a large body of fixed facts.
Audience and purpose matter conceptually, but the work stays close to concrete workplace writing tasks and usable documents.
Students need baseline college writing competence, but Rutgers presents this as a fundamentals course rather than one that assumes deep prior technical training.
Rutgers says a significant amount of independent research is required, suggesting a moderate reading and source-gathering burden even if assigned reading is not the main event.
Public student discussion often describes the class by project types and compares it with other writing options; exact assignments vary by section.
Students describe practical documents and group work as central to the experience.
The workplace-document focus makes the course feel different from literary or research-only writing courses.
A practical chapter-by-chapter view from foundations to applications.
Module 1
Technical communication starts with understanding what readers need and why the document exists.
Technical writing succeeds when readers can act on it.
A memo, instruction set, and report organize information differently.
Collaborative writing works best with roles, shared standards, and revision plans.
Define the workplace reader and what they need to do.
Use headings, sequence, and formatting to make documents usable.
Plan voice, structure, and revision together.
2 open · C/D
| Section | Status | Instructor | Meeting | Campus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0112042 | Open | MAGRINO | Monday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at HCK 123; Wednesday 2:00 PM-3:20 PM at HCK 123HCK 123 | C/D |
| 0212043 | Open | MAGRINO | Monday 12:10 PM-1:30 PM at HCK 123; Thursday 12:10 PM-1:30 PM at HCK 123HCK 123 | C/D |
Historical student surveys
Teaching
4.45
Course quality
4.34
Response rate
79.8%
Coverage
44 offerings · 2016–2025
| Instructor | Offerings | Teaching | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Howland, David | 10 | 4.65 | 4.54 |
| Howland, Dave | 8 | 4.51 | 4.41 |
| WHEELER PATRICK | 7 | 4.33 | 4.27 |
| DELAURENTIS CATHERINE | 6 | 3.97 | 3.88 |
| HOWLAND DAVID | 4 | 4.60 | 4.33 |
| Magrino, William | 3 | 4.57 | 4.57 |
Catalog and planning context
Credits
3
Current campuses
C/D
Current availability
2 open of 2
Catalog terms
Fall, Spring
Core codes
WCr
Loaded terms
4
(01:355:101)<em> OR </em>(01:355:103)<em> OR </em>(01:355:104)<em> OR </em>(21:355:102)<em> OR </em>(50:989:102)
No direct degree-list membership appears in the checked-in requirement index.